|
I read a post recently that I haven't been able to stop thinking about. But because of his method. Every other coach told this person the same thing: if you want to make money online faster, you need to do sales calls. That's the fastest path. That's how you close clients. Get comfortable with it. Stijn was the only one who said: you don't have to. His conclusion: what you refuse to do is often more compelling than what you offer to do. He's not wrong. But I think a lot of beginners will read that post and use it as permission to avoid something they should be running toward. Why the idea is so seductiveNo awkward silences. No pressure. No having to think on your feet while someone pushes back on your price. The no-call approach promises all the upside of freelancing without the part that makes most people sweat. And for introverted creators who already dread the phone, it sounds like liberation. I was attracted to it too. It sounded elegant. Minimalistic. Hassle-free. But elegant and effective aren't the same thing. Especially at the start. Why it's still a bad idea for most beginnersImagine you study criminology at UCLA. Smart, ambitious, going places. Then a recruiter calls. They want you to head up a patrol division in LA County. 150 people reporting to you. Detectives, sergeants, patrol officers, the whole operation. You'd quickly realize that no matter how sharp your theory is, you're completely unequipped for it. You've never walked a beat. Never handled a suspect at 2am when everything goes sideways. Never made a split-second call with lives on the line. There's a reason police departments promote from within. You need to have gone through the crucible to lead it. That's why you don't become patrol captain by skipping patrol duty. Sales calls are the streets. They teach you what your clients actually care about, where your pitch breaks down, what objections keep coming up, how to handle pressure in real time, and how to make decisions without a script. After 100 of them you know your buyer in a way no email thread will ever teach you. You can't shortcut your way to becoming that person. You can only earn it. Giving people what they want vs. what they needStijn gave his client what they wanted. That's not wrong — it's smart positioning. But there's a difference between meeting your client's preference and building your entire business around your own avoidance. Avoiding calls because you prefer it is a valid niche decision when made from experience. Avoiding calls because you prefer it as a beginner is something else entirely. It's self-protection masquerading as strategy. What you're actually skippingThe real cost of no-call selling isn't the clients who prefer calls. It's the feedback loop you never build. Every call you avoid is a conversation you didn't have, an objection you didn't hear, a nuance about your market you'll never pick up from an email thread. Every awkward silence you skip is a moment that would have taught you something about how to handle the next one. That accumulation of real conversations, real pressure, real human reactions to your offer: that's what turns a freelancer into someone who actually knows what they're doing. Do the uncomfortable thing firstStijn has 60,000+ followers and clients finding him through his content. He's earned the right to set his terms. Most beginners haven't yet. I still don't love the idea of sales calls. But I've stopped using that preference as a reason to avoid them. Do them first. Do them badly. Do them until they stop feeling like a threat and start feeling like information. Then, once you've walked the beat long enough to know the streets, decide exactly how you want your business to run. Not from avoidance. From experience. That's the only version of the no-call approach worth having. Warmly, Bjorn |
Every Sunday, I send a 5-minute email documenting how I'm escaping my 9-5 with simple "ugly" emails that sell—the wins, the mistakes, what's actually working—so you can do it too (it's free)
Nobody chooses to become a poodle. But this is how it happened to me. I'd consumed the news obsessively for years. Served a steady diet of problems I was in no position to solve. I used to be happy, optimistic — someone who saw the possibilities in everything. Now I believed it was all downhill from here. That this was as good as life was ever going to be. I was 25 years old. In fact, I used to be a runner. Now the only thing I ran to was McDonald's. With no hope, there was no point in...
Years ago I saw a meme I still can't shake. A side-by-side image of Bruce Springsteen and Göran Persson — the former Prime Minister of Sweden.Both born the same year.Both men of power and money.Both 65 at the time of the photo.One was shirtless in the ocean, looking 45.One was pot-bellied, bespectacled, looking like he'd already retired from life. Bruce Springsteen (left), Göran Persson (right) I was shocked that two successful men of the same age could look so different. That's when I made a...
A colleague asked me recently: "Why does it seem like whatever random topic comes up in conversation, you always seem to know something about it?" I didn't have a ready answer. But sitting with it later, I think I know why. I've been an amateur engineer, an aspiring doctor, a history obsessive, an archer, a pistol shooter, a judoka, a dog sledder, a camper, a chess player, a guitarist, and a runner. I've started more things than I can count and abandoned most of them before they got hard. For...